’' While much is voiced about the merits of forceful advocacy, not enough is said about the fundamental requisite of advancing public health with sustainable evidence, rather than by dangerous, wanton conjectures.’’
Through strategic training, communication, and outreach, Citizens Freedom Alliance, Inc. advances a common sense approach under which individuals can control their destinies as free and responsible members of society.
Regional, national, and international organisations, now bound in solidarity against the damaging prohibitions which in most cases serve to enrich special interests through scientific fraud and political manipulation
An educational tool to debunk misinformation and exaggerations about active and passive smoking,
A book, website and blog on the history of anti-smoking
Rampant Antismoking Signifies Grave Danger presents an examination of the antismoking mentality in greater, multidimensional context.
Includes the work and writings of Michael J. McFadden,
the author of
Dissecting Antismokers' Brains
Fighting the smoking ban agenda by exposing the lies and the pharmaceutical nicotine interests that fund them.
"Who Really Profits from Smoking Bans? Not bars!
Opponents of Ohio Bans say Follow the Money"
Joe Jackson has recently attracted a lot of attention for speaking out against antismoking hysteria and smoking bans. His position is based on neither personal prejudice nor profit, but on several years of research.
SECOND HAND SMOKE SCIENCE IS BOGUS
Click on each title to read the full articles
In this extremely harsh 1998 decision, a district judge in North Carolina demolishes the EPA for its blatant fraud and extreme bias in representing absolutely baseless junk science as established fact.
''HSE cannot produce epidemiological evidence to link levels of exposure to SHS to the raised risk of contracting specific diseases and it is therefore difficult to prove health-related breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act.''
''Why I Voted Against the Statewide Smoking Ban''
The late Michael Crichton explains why the second hand smoke scare is bogus.
The number of estimated deaths in the field where restricting laws might be applied and efficient is so low that it makes you wonder what the real aim of this report is, and what conflicts of interests are hidden behind it.
‘’The link between secondhand smoke and premature death is a real stretch.’’ Dr. Elizabeth Whelan – American Council on Science and Health
''The abuse of scientific integrity and the generation of faulty "scientific" outcomes (through the use of pseudoscience) have led to the deception of the American public on a grand scale and to draconian government overregulation and the squandering of public money.''
''The Surgeon General was incorrect. Second hand smoke may be an irritant and an annoyance, but it’s not a cause of death. There are no body bags filled with those who have developed tumors or heart disease as a result of second-hand smoke. The body bags are filled, however, with scientists and physicians who dare go against the anti-smoking lobby and state the obvious—the science isn’t there. ''
In this exclusive interview, expert tobacco researcher Dr Kamal Chaouachi talks to Chris Snowdon about hookah smoking and the anti-smoking movement, and explains why the World Health Organisation has lost its scientific credibility in the field of tobacco.
In this explosive interview, David Goerlitz, former Winston man, talks about how the tobacco control movement lost its way to become a "corrupt" and "greedy" institution dominated by extremists and "wackos".
We are bombarded by claims that even slight exposure to second hand tobacco smoke is deadly. It only takes a simple examination of the facts to debunk this fallacy.
The global news industry is violating its Principles and Ethics of Journalism by deliberately secretly refusing to report that many scientists, researchers, as well as millions of tobacco smokers believe that
Second Hand Tobacco Smoke is NOT a Statistically Significant Health Risk to other people
Smoke Screens - The Truth About Tobacco leaves no stone unturned and provides an encyclopedic view into one of the largest issues in society today. With global smoking bans now in place and the World Health Organisation declaring a global war against tobacco smoking, the book is timely and relevant.
''There are convincing reasons to believe that many things about the Heather Crowe story are not what they appear to be.''
The dangers of passive smoke are a totally false representation of the epidemiological evidence by activists, lobby groups, medical associations, and health authorities.
Please read and sign the Brussels Declaration on Scientific Integrity
Lies about the health effects of small amounts of smoke upon workers, lies about customer demands, and lies about the expected economic effects on bars, entertainment venues, and small restaurants.
Dissecting Antismokers’ Brains will show clear evidence that the risk of secondary smoke to nonsmokers has been twisted and exaggerated beyond all reason purely as a tool of social engineering.
In this rousing rebuttal to the almost universal public attack against tobacco and its users, Sullum provides a rational and common sense defense of the rights of smokers, arguing that government bureaucrats must respect the rights of adults who make the informed decision to smoke.
''Most of us want to run our own lives, and help people by selling them things, or offering them charity or advice -- any of which they can take or leave. People who want to run other people's lives are ... different. They are the people we should be most worried about. '' John Stossel
Nouvelle chasse aux sorcières, cette lutte prend pour cible le fumeur et non plus seulement le tabac : une nouvelle forme de discrimination, révélatrice des travers liberticides du moralisme et de l’hygiénisme contemporains.
« Laisseriez-vous votre chien à l'extérieur durant les tempêtes et les journées froides de l'hiver ?
Empêcheriez-vous votre chat ou votre chien de monter dans votre voiture à cause de son odeur ou de ses poils ?
En sommes-nous rendus à manifester plus de compassion envers les animaux qu'envers les humains ?»
Le Formindep est fier d’offrir au Professeur Molimard cette tribune libre qu’il utilisera, nous l’espérons, sans modération.
Learn how anti-smoking fanatics use tobacco control as an effective form of social engineering. King offers solutions so that smokers and non-smokers can be accommodated in a free society, where it must never be a crime to smoke in a bar, in a car, in the open air, in a restaurant, or at home.
''The claims about the deleterious effects of second hand smoke are based on nothing more than cooked statistics--there are no bodies, no autopsy reports.''
Please read the English translation of an Interview with Pr. Philippe Even, world reknown pneumologist and president of the prestigious Necker Research Institute, explaining why smoking bans are based on a lie and how there is no proof that second hand smoke causes any significant harm .
"If you think you are too small to make a difference, try sleeping with a mosquito." Dalai Lama XIV
This page and the ads that lead to it is the initiative of a group of ordinary citizens driven by their only desire to expose the anti-smoking shenanigans, exaggerations and outright lies. They receive no funding whatsoever from any corporation or entity with financial interests in the tobacco issue. If you wish to donate to keep the ad running, please contact us at: fightingback2@gmail.com. Any donation big or small helps.
Watch this video and find out who funds smoking bans and why.
Researchers with political agendas often seem willing to bias how they interpret their data to better support their worldly goals. Researchers who work as part of the anti-tobacco orthodoxy appear particularly willing to do so. Selective citation and cherry-picking favored results is woefully common (...)
The differences between the toxins in the main- and side-stream of tobacco smoke and also the lack of significantly elevated risk ratios in epidemiological studies do not permit scientific conclusions endorsing a connection between passive smoking and lung cancer, which has become an emotionalised issue.
THE INTERNATIONAL FIGHTERS
Our goal is to end the discrimination against smokers by exposing the anti-smoking lies
A short video from an interview with Pr. John Davies, Director, Centre for Applied Psychology expressing how he feels about the passive smoking modern hysteria.
A case-control study in the greater Toronto area to evaluate potential lung cancer risk factors including environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure, family history of cancer, indoor air pollution, workplace
exposures and history of previous respiratory diseases with special consideration given to never smokers, found no association between either exposure to ETS at home or at the workplace and lung cancer risk.
Intelligent discussion between different professionals on the second hand smoke issue.
Pr. Robert Molimard exposes the various lies and shenanigans in the tobacco issue including passive smoke.
Secondhand Smoke and Smoking Bans
Is The Debate Really Over?
From the author of Velvet Glove, Iron Fist.
The Art of Suppression: Pleasure, Panic and
Prohibition since 1800
"When politicians start legislating private behaviour, they find it very hard to quit"
‘’ This analysis presents a detailed defense of my epidemiologic research in the May 17, 2003 British
Medical Journal that found no significant relationship between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS)
and tobacco-related mortality’’ - James E. Enstrom
Are you being manipulated and lied to for corporate, political and personal gain?
You owe it to yourself, to your fellow citizens and to future generations to find out how and why the anti-tobacco movement has perverted the truth and has driven citizens towards inter-relational and personal dysfunction and how it has caused economic hardship to societies throughout the world. Find out why it will not stop with tobacco and how your lifestyle choices will sooner or later be attacked unless you act now.
The good news is that millions of people now recognize that ''the emperor is wearing no clothes''. True grassroots associations have been created throughout the world to combat the manipulations and lies. We present you with a partial list of such organizations, forums, literature. Read what they have to say, analyze the issues and form your own informed opinion. Join one or all of these groups and make your voice count. Becoming a member of any of these organizations is generally free, but voluntary donations are welcome and encouraged.
Please take the time to read and sign the Brussels Declaration on scientific integrity which you will find at the very bottom of this page.
Placing Scientific Credibility at Risk
''The theory that if something is carcinogenic at high doses it must also be proportionately so at small doses simply does not fit the real world.''
Translation of an article published in the Dutch weekly magazine HP/De Tijd on 28 November 2003)
''Despite the claims of the champions of public smoking bans, it is clear that the beautiful hypothesis that ETS is a major killer and, hence, a major public health problem that defies solution – except through total prohibition of public smoking – and which leads to reductions in smoking, all without any costs, has been slain by very many ugly facts.''
So, how dangerous IS secondhand smoke? The most reliable data would indicate that it is nowhere near as serious a threat as elements of the media (and their supporters within academia) would have us believe. In fact, ETS is, at its most extreme, far less dangerous than numerous other indoor air pollutants such as carbon monoxide, toxic mold, and radon.
Citizens Against Government Encroachment (C.A.G.E. - "Citoyens Anti Gouvernement Envahissant") was created to counter the multi-pronged assault on personal liberties and lifestyle choices of ordinary people.
Freedom To Choose seeks to protect the informed choices of consenting adults with sensible and achievable goals on the issues of smoking
“The question ‘Is passive smoking injurious to health?’ is commonly regarded as having already been unequivocally answered. I, however, did not find any such unequivocal answer in my prevention investigation. Quite the contrary!”
Prof. Romano Grieshaber
Abolishing the smoking ban in the HoReCa sector is only a matter of time, money and the best people in the right places
